Photo #1086541

92
136
πŸ‹πŸ’§: As long as there is also a forward view paired with it in uploads I would accept it.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
QIT: No, I don't think so. You should be fine.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Thanks for explaining that, Peachy. It happened to me a lot when I submitted back views, none of which ever got through. You don't know what you guys missed!
by Lemondrop, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
Peachy: My upload queue says -1. Will I break the site if I try to upload?
by qit, 1 month ago
Faceless/age udefined just means I could not see enough of her to confidently identity her as a teen. I don't issue strikes for this. It's just a courtesy explanation as to why the upload didn't make it through.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
LARB: Just looked through the rules throughly and it says that "Headless" is not allowed. No mention of faceless. I thought the rule was faceless though. I could find some 20 something aged women with petite frames with their backs turned from the camera and you would not necessarily know they were not teen. I am being a little pedantic but I think you get the point. A couple of examples of faceless would be #158959 #158661 #158961 and then we have ones where the face is deliberately obscured #158767 I also think the rules are vague around this area so that the mods/admins have some wiggle room.
by User1701, 1 month ago
@User1701 - you're right, I didn't recognize her, but that's the same girl in #1147706, with almost a quarter of a million IG followers. Yes, one of the mods specifically confirmed her ineligibility, though the comment has been deleted. We'll just have to wait to see how they rule on this.
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
Could you give us a clarification of the meaning and rules regarding "faceless", and how that differs from girls seen only from the back? I've been confused about this for a long time.
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
And I do remember the discussion about said girl, but the comments have been deleted so I cannot check. I thought stets said she was excluded, but again, the comment has been removed so there is no history of the conversations.
by User1701, 1 month ago
LARB: but this has been allowed also... #1147706 ????
by User1701, 1 month ago
Tattoos. Different countries have different laws on age. The united states you can get one at 16 with your parent there.
by Bloodragedil, 1 month ago
I agree on no difference between a headless picture and a picture with them turned away. There is no possible way to determine whether or not the girl is the appropriate age for this site. Personally I want to see the face. If I wanted just an ass or chest picture I would go elsewhere.
by Bloodragedil, 1 month ago
While it is true that being IG famous and being a pro are often not the same thing, the girl you are pointing out is absolutely disallowed. Peachy said so, but didn't yet have the tool to remove the picture before it got in. Unfortunately her comment is gone because that comment page made the gallery. IG celebrities have been strictly disallowed for a long time.
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
Being Instagram famous and being a pro are 2 different things. For example #158734 has approx 250k followers but she is allowed.
by User1701, 1 month ago
lol great minds think alike
by qit, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.
I haven't uploaded anything in a while so I went ahead and gave it a shot. Wish me luck.
by mcfish1, 1 month ago
From my understanding on that is that if the pic is kind of with a set in a row and they are wearing the same clothes or suit. Then it would be allowed because you'd be able to see a face on a previous pic with that girl. Otherwise then no it wouldn't be allowed anymore. Some of the ones you come across have been on this site for a while and the rules were different then.
by mcfish1, 1 month ago
user1701: actually I got one knocked back that was a full length rear shot of a girl who's already on the site so I'm guessing those aren't allowed anymore
by qit, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
Prachy, could you answer a question for me please? Site rules say that headless shots are not allowed (I was told this was because she cannot be determined), however, pictures where we cannot see the face (back turned to camera) are allowed? Makes no sense to me. I could find a pic of a non jb with back turned and no face seen and it would get approved. The body will look like JB though. Just a question, no reasoning behind it. Thanks
by User1701, 1 month ago
Also my queue shows -1 photos now...
by qit, 1 month ago
Admin must have gotten to it first. All I get is a dead link.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
...Well spotted dax!
by qit, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
OMFG. I did the entire approval process on my damn mobile. What a total fuckin nightmare. πŸ˜–
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
Uploads coming now.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Thanks Peach, you are awesome! And I promise if and once my full privileges are restored, I’ll do my best to comply with the rules.
by flipicanqt, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
Peachy: Am I up for consideration getting my uploading privileges back? I’d like to at least get to vote again.
by flipicanqt, 1 month ago
Jezzvozz: The best advice I can give you, other than gaining a thorough knowledge of the FAQ, is looking at the top ten photos after each Home Page/Cover Girl and comparing your prospective uploads with them.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Thanks!
by LaurenJ, 1 month ago
Hover over the pics with the red bar and a reason will appear, if the reason is a bunch of gibberish hit f5 then try again. If not, it will tell you why the pic wasn't accepted.
by qit, 1 month ago
When I upload and some pics get a red bar, does that mean it didn't work, try again, or is it because they got rejected by the server?
by LaurenJ, 1 month ago
Thank you peachy for the answer, I’m learning!
by jezzvozz, 1 month ago
Jezzvozz: If I'm remembering the right pics, they got a hit in the image finder. Professional models, professional photos and copyrighted photos are not allowed. However I don't issue strikes for those unless they become excessive. You got a strike for the males. Screenshots, obvious photoshopping and artificial overlay will also earn a strike. Three strikes and you lose your uploading privilege.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
JAMESBONDB: Your commenting privilege is restored. I do not know why it was switched off. Sorry about that.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
GEARBOXX61: We don't make comments like that here. Read the Rules/FAQ.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
Fair enough peachy. But like the other said, temp tattoo/perm tattoo... at a distance it is really hard to tell. I am sure some cultures must allow tattoos for under 18s though.
by User1701, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
User1701: Actually, her other pics won't be coming through tonight. Too strong of a male presence in both of them. The girl is about 13 years old though.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
DAX22: Thank you! I thought that was water from a sprinkler or something. STETS and GREATGUY: Thank you! I just didn't see that border somehow 😜
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
User1701: That isn't a tattoo. That girl is actually on the border of being too young to let through. You'll see when her other pics come through tonight.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
I've seen too many of these teens these days getting temp tattoos that you won't know if it is real or not.
by mcfish1, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
And I know she does not look too old, but I thought that was what teengallery always said. There was no grey area.
by User1701, 1 month ago
#1147716 tattoo = too old?
by User1701, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
No point having vote buttons if everything is worth voting keep for, and no point trying the occasional new thing to upload if it won't even get through. Spices things up a bit this way.
by qit, 1 month ago
I love downvoting bad pics! :)
by stetsonrukaka, 1 month ago
For sure. Some real garbage. But the consensus was to let the voters decide.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Although there are some stunning pics in today's uploads, I don't think I've ever downvoted so many uploads ... Quite a lot of less than mediocre material, especially picture quality-wise.
by greatguy, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
Incoming uploads.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Thank you, and thank you and everyone for being patient with me as I acclimate to my new responsibilities.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Sorry, never mind, it's not important. πŸ™ƒ Keep the faith. You're doing an amazing job! πŸ‘
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
Who?
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Guess who got mail? πŸ˜ƒ
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
Yep. I screwed up on that one. Totally my bad. Unfortunately I can not pull it out now and it would be unfair to issue a strike when I messed up by allowing it through. I will try to be more scrutinous, more evenly scrutinous moving forward.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
To me #158830 has more of a male in pic than #159025 neither one seems like it should warrant a strike but then again I don’t upload so what do I know
by Slikjohnson, 1 month ago
Love ya, Peachy❣️
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
It sure as fuck upset me when I got a strike for it. And the success of the pic once it was allowed speaks for itself. Being the original uploader, I obviously thought the pic was fine. Two different approvers had different opinions. They are both 100% valid.
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
Yes, we crossed messages on the minute. Lol. But good, glad we understand each other. 😊 πŸ‘
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
#159025 glad it was approved. This is the type of "male in pic" picture that i think upsets uploaders. The male is irrelevant and doesnt change the picture. And this is a great pic definitely deserving to be here! Good job!
by dax22, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
TexasSugarDaddy: Type the word "TAGS" with a colon. Every word after that will appear as a tag. If you want two words seperated by a space to appear and function as a single tag then encapsulate them in quotes like "blue water".
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Did we cross messages? πŸ˜ƒ See, everything is cool!
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
LARB: Dutchbeauty made that call, I made this call. I'm sorry the application of the rule enforcement is not exactly even between two different photo approvers, we each make the best calls that we can. I aim to be as fair as possible but we're only human. For me, if I can clearly identify a subject as male then I will reject the photo.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
Re: my message on last comment page. I am not complaining, but I thought it was important to state the fact. Different approvers, different opinions. It's all OK πŸ‘Œ
by LikeARubberBall, 1 month ago
ATTN: I strongly advise reading the Rules/FAQ before posting comments, uploading photos or making lists as INFRACTIONS RESULT IN LOSS OF PRIVILEGES. Ask any other questions here on the Comment Page and your friendly neighborhood Moderator will answer them. Thank you! πŸ˜€
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
To correctly link photos in the Main Gallery you need to sandwich the photo number between two hashtags. If the photo is still in Uploads/Voting then use brackets instead. To link to a photo list, flank the list number with a percent sign, a 2 and a capital B, on both sides with no spaces. Never post URLs.
by peachygirl99, 1 month ago
This comment has been removed.
You need to be logged in to comment.
Click here to log in.